關(guān)于哥本哈根會議的美文700字

熱心網(wǎng)友：

拉斯穆森首相閣下，各位同事：

　　此時此刻，全世界幾十億人都在注視著哥本哈根。我們在此表達(dá)的意愿和做出的承諾，應(yīng)當(dāng)有利于推動人類應(yīng)對氣候變化的歷史進(jìn)程。站在這個講壇上，我深感責(zé)任重大。

　　氣候變化是當(dāng)今全球面臨的重大挑戰(zhàn)。遏制氣候變暖，拯救地球家園，是全人類共同的使命，每個國家和民族，每個企業(yè)和個人，都應(yīng)當(dāng)責(zé)無旁貸地行動起來。

　　近三十年來，中國現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)取得的成就已為世人矚目。在這里我還要告訴各位，中國在發(fā)展的進(jìn)程中高度重視氣候變化問題，從中國人民和人類長遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展的根本利益出發(fā)，為應(yīng)對氣候變化做出了不懈努力和積極貢獻(xiàn)。

　　——中國是最早制定實(shí)施《應(yīng)對氣候變化國家方案》的發(fā)展中國家。先后制定和修訂了節(jié)約能源法、可再生能源法、循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)促進(jìn)法、清潔生產(chǎn)促進(jìn)法、森林法、草原法和民用建筑節(jié)能條例等一系列法律法規(guī)，把法律法規(guī)作為應(yīng)對氣候變化的重要手段。

　　——中國是近年來節(jié)能減排力度最大的國家。我們不斷完善稅收制度，積極推進(jìn)資源性產(chǎn)品價格改革，加快建立能夠充分反映市場供求關(guān)系、資源稀缺程度、環(huán)境損害成本的價格形成機(jī)制。全面實(shí)施十大重點(diǎn)節(jié)能工程和千家企業(yè)節(jié)能計(jì)劃，在工業(yè)、交通、建筑等重點(diǎn)領(lǐng)域開展節(jié)能行動。深入推進(jìn)循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)試點(diǎn)，大力推廣節(jié)能環(huán)保汽車，實(shí)施節(jié)能產(chǎn)品惠民工程。推動淘汰高耗能、高污染的落后產(chǎn)能，2006至2008年共淘汰低能效的煉鐵產(chǎn)能6059萬噸、煉鋼產(chǎn)能 4347萬噸、水泥產(chǎn)能1.4億噸、焦炭產(chǎn)能6445萬噸。截至今年上半年，中國單位國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值能耗比2005年降低13%，相當(dāng)于少排放8億噸二氧化碳。

　　——中國是新能源和可再生能源增長速度最快的國家。我們在保護(hù)生態(tài)基礎(chǔ)上，有序發(fā)展水電，積極發(fā)展核電，鼓勵支持農(nóng)村、邊遠(yuǎn)地區(qū)和條件適宜地區(qū)大力發(fā)展生物質(zhì)能、太陽能、地?zé)帷L(fēng)能等新型可再生能源。2005年至2008年，可再生能源增長51%，年均增長14.7%。2008年可再生能源利用量達(dá)到2.5億噸標(biāo)準(zhǔn)煤。農(nóng)村有3050萬戶用上沼氣，相當(dāng)于少排放二氧化碳4900多萬噸。水電裝機(jī)容量、核電在建規(guī)模、太陽能熱水器集熱面積和光伏發(fā)電容量均居世界第一位。

　　——中國是世界人工造林面積最大的國家。我們持續(xù)大規(guī)模開展退耕還林和植樹造林，大力增加森林碳匯。2003至2008年，森林面積凈增2054萬公頃，森林蓄積量凈增11.23億立方米。目前人工造林面積達(dá)5400萬公頃，居世界第一。

　　中國有13億人口，人均國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值剛剛超過3000美元，按照聯(lián)合國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，還有1.5億人生活在貧困線以下，發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)、改善民生的任務(wù)十分艱巨。我國正處于工業(yè)化、城鎮(zhèn)化快速發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵階段，能源結(jié)構(gòu)以煤為主，降低排放存在特殊困難。但是，我們始終把應(yīng)對氣候變化作為重要戰(zhàn)略任務(wù)。1990至 2005年，單位國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值二氧化碳排放強(qiáng)度下降46%。在此基礎(chǔ)上，我們又提出，到2020年單位國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值二氧化碳排放比2005年下降 40%－45%，在如此長時間內(nèi)這樣大規(guī)模降低二氧化碳排放，需要付出艱苦卓絕的努力。我們的減排目標(biāo)將作為約束性指標(biāo)納入國民經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會發(fā)展的中長期規(guī)劃，保證承諾的執(zhí)行受到法律和輿論的監(jiān)督。我們將進(jìn)一步完善國內(nèi)統(tǒng)計(jì)、監(jiān)測、考核辦法，改進(jìn)減排信息的披露方式，增加透明度，積極開展國際交流、對話與合作。　

希望可以幫到你。

###

熱心網(wǎng)友：

Copenhagen summit ended after the storms did not rainbow

哥 本 哈 根峰會落幕 風(fēng)雨過后未見彩虹

　The United Nations summit on climate change ended Saturday with a fractious all-night debate over an agreement brokered by China and the U.S. that has no legal force, and is vague on crucial details.

The fundamental disagreements over the appropriate response to climate change among the U.S., China, Europe and a divided group of developing nations led to a near total breakdown of talks during the two-week summit attended by representatives of nearly 200 nations. The non-binding final statement, produced in a flurry of last-minute bargaining led by U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, received a tepid endorsement Saturday morning after hours of angry exchanges among frustrated, hungry and tired diplomats, many of whom complained that the final agreement was made without their participation.

The statement said countries would 'enhance our long-term cooperative action to combat climate change,' but it didn't obligate any country to meet a specific emission-reduction target.

The Copenhagen Accord did produce a pledge by rich countries to send billions of dollars to the developing world to help it cope with the effects of climate change and to implement lower-carbon technologies. Industrialized countries said they would provide a pot of money 'approaching' $30 billion over the next three years and to 'commit to a goal of mobilizing' $100 billion annually by 2020.

Yet amid the global recession, no one offered details on where that money might come from. Some analysts who have followed international climate talks for years said the $30 billion pledged appeared mainly to restate previous offers from rich countries. As for the $100 billion a year by 2020, U.S. officials said the vast majority of it would come from the private sector, in particular through the buying and selling of 'carbon credits,' and not from government coffers.

　Negotiators sought to put the best face possible on what they dubbed the Copenhagen Accord, calling it a first step that they hoped to follow up with a more-detailed, and more-enforceable, international climate pact sometime over the next year. But given that negotiators left Copenhagen as divided as ever over how a tougher agreement might affect each of their countries' economic competitiveness, they said they couldn't predict how the process might unfold.

Copenhagen's messy process and vague outcome led many to question whether a U.N. process will ever produce an agreement to seriously slash greenhouse-gas emissions. The process's guarantee that all nations will have a say led the talks to bog down for more than 10 days of procedural wrangling and mutual distrust before their heads of government swooped in late last week and hammered out the 2 1/2-page statement of resolve.

The U.N. climate process will tumble now into a series of future meetings. U.N. Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and many other negotiators said Saturday they hoped to hash out the specifics by the next big annual U.N. climate summit, scheduled for late next year in Mexico.

'Ideally speaking, we should have a legally binding treaty,' said Mr. Ban, noting that he had slept two hours in two days and hadn't eaten a meal since Friday lunch. 'This kind of negotiation process is very complex.'

　For industries that would be affected by binding limits on carbon-dioxide emissions -- steelmakers, power generators, oil companies and chemical manufacturers among many -- the non-binding Copenhagen Accord failed to provide the regulatory certainty that could unleash private investment in lower-carbon technologies, from more-efficient coal-fired power-plant machinery to electric cars to solar panels.

'Business is seeking predictability to help plan its future global investments,' Laurent Corbier, chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce's energy-and-environment commission, said in a statement over the weekend.

　Because the Copenhagen statement isn't binding, it needn't form the basis of any future negotiations.

　'It's not a treaty,' one Chinese negotiator reminded his colleagues as the official session was winding up Saturday, following agreement on the Copenhagen Accord. 'It's not going to be signed or agreed to.'

Mr. Ban noted that the pact gives countries until Jan. 31 to voluntarily list, in an annex to the accord, voluntary pledges to curb their emissions.Major economies -- including the U.S., China, the European Union and Brazil -- made such pledges in the lead-up to Copenhagen. Those pledges fall short of the severe cuts that many scientists, and some governments, have said are necessary by midcentury to avoid potentially dangerous consequences from climate change.